Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/18/24 23:54, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
From: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>

The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration
until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can
be evaluated.

If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in
acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has
not yet been added so for now this will be called for the original
hotplug case.

For architectures that do not defer until the ACPI Processor
driver loads (e.g. x86), for initially present CPUs there will
already be a CPU device. If present do not try to register again.

Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an
ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu()
will not have deferred registration when first called.

This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(),
while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier.
Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so
there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this
specific case.

[PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
commit 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joanthan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

s/Joanthan/Jonathan ?

v7: Simplify the logic on whether to hotadd the CPU.
     This path can only be reached either for coldplug in which
     case all we care about is has register_cpu() already been
     called (identifying deferred), or hotplug in which case
     whether register_cpu() has been called is also sufficient.
     Checks on _STA related elements or the validity of the ID
     are no longer necessary here due to similar checks having
     moved elsewhere in the path.
v6: Squash the two paths for conventional CPU Hotplug and arm64
     vCPU HP.
---
  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 127ae8dcb787..4e65011e706c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -350,14 +350,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
  	}
/*
-	 *  Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with
-	 *  less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
-	 *  they are physically not present.
-	 *
-	 *  NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present
-	 *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
+	 *  This code is not called unless we know the CPU is present and
+	 *  enabled. The two paths are:
+	 *  a) Initially present CPUs on architectures that do not defer
+	 *     their arch_register_cpu() calls until this point.
+	 *  b) Hotplugged CPUs (enabled bit in _STA has transitioned from not
+	 *     enabled to enabled)
  	 */
-	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
+	if (!get_cpu_device(pr->id)) {
  		ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
if (ret)

Thanks,
Gavin





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux