Re: [PATCH v7 03/16] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 2024/4/18 21:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
The ACPI bus scan will only result in acpi_processor_add() being called
if _STA has already been checked and the result is that the
processor is enabled and present.  Hence drop this additional check.

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

v7: No change
v6: New patch to drop this unnecessary code. Now I think we only
     need to explicitly read STA to print a warning in the ARM64
     arch_unregister_cpu() path where we want to know if the
     present bit has been unset as well.
  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 6 ------
  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 7fc924aeeed0..ba0a6f0ac841 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -186,17 +186,11 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {}
  static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-	unsigned long long sta;
-	acpi_status status;
  	int ret;
if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id))
  		return -ENODEV;
- status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT))
-		return -ENODEV;

Since the status bits were checked before acpi_processor_add() being
called, do we need to remove the if (!acpi_device_is_enabled(device))
check in acpi_processor_add() as well?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux