On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:49:29AM +0800, albanhuang wrote: > 在 2024/4/9 20:53, Andy Shevchenko 写道: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:43:20PM +0800, Guanbing Huang wrote: > > > From: Guanbing Huang <albanhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The 16550a serial port based on the ACPI table requires obtaining the > > > reg-shift attribute. In the ACPI scenario, If the reg-shift property > > > is not configured like in DTS, the 16550a serial driver cannot read or > > > write controller registers properly during initialization. > > > > > > To address the issue of configuring the reg-shift property, the > > > __uart_read_properties() universal interface is called to implement it. > > > Adaptation of PNP devices is done in the __uart_read_properties() function. > > You either forgot or deliberately not added my tag. Can you elaborate? > > I'm very sorry, this is my first time submitting a kernel patch. My > understanding > > of the submission specification is not comprehensive and profound enough, > > and I didn't intentionally not add tags. I hope you can forgive my > operational mistake. > > Should I just add a "Reviewed-by tag", or do I need any other tags? Thanks. Understood. So if you are is one who is sending a new version, you should take care about any given tags (such as Reviewed-by) and carry them, in case the code is not drastically changed. I.o.w. if you don't, you have to explain why. Anyways, it seems the patch still has a flaw as per LKP, so fix that by providing probably two macros in the pnp.h header for both cases (CONFIG_PNP=y/n), and I will review it again. #ifdef CONFIG_PNP ... #define dev_is_pnp(...) ... ... #else ... #define dev_is_pnp(...) false ... #endif -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
