On 4/8/2024 1:19 PM, Jarred White wrote:
> On 4/1/2024 10:45 AM, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:48:28AM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> Hi Vanshi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing and catching this. One comment below, but Jarred is OOF for a couple days so
>>> we'll get back again after testing on our platform.
>>>
>>> On 3/29/2024 3:00 PM, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
>>>> Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
>>>> system memory accesses") modified cpc_read/cpc_write to use access_width to
>>>> read CPC registers. For PCC registers the access width field in the ACPI
>>>> register macro specifies the PCC subspace id. For non-zero PCC subspace id
>>>> the access width is incorrectly treated as access width. This causes errors
>>>> when reading from PCC registers in the CPPC driver.
>>>>
>>>> For PCC registers base the size of read/write on the bit width field.
>>>> The debug message in cpc_read/cpc_write is updated to print relevant
>>>> information for the address space type used to read the register.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
Hi Vanshi,
When you send v2 for the SystemMemory space fixes, could you add CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.15+
to your commit message, since your patch fixes 2f4a4d63a193 that was marked for stable?
Thanks,
Easwar
