Re: [RFC PATCH v7 12/12] memory: RAS2: Add memory RAS2 driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+/*
+ * The below functions are exposed to OSPM, to query, configure and
+ * initiate memory patrol scrub.
+ */
+static int ras2_is_patrol_scrub_support(struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct acpi_ras2_shared_memory  __iomem *generic_comm_base;
+
+	if (!ras2_ctx || !ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	generic_comm_base = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr;
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	generic_comm_base->set_capabilities[0] = 0;
+
+	/* send command for reading RAS2 capabilities */
+	ret = ras2_send_pcc_cmd(ras2_ctx, RAS2_PCC_CMD_EXEC);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: ras2_send_pcc_cmd failed\n", __func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return generic_comm_base->features[0] & RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB;

Since firmware populates the feature bitmask on initialization, it would seem
that we do not need to send a PCC CMD EXEC to read RAS2 capabilities.
+}
+
+static int ras2_get_patrol_scrub_params(struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx,
+					struct ras2_scrub_params *params)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	u8  min_supp_scrub_rate, max_supp_scrub_rate;
+	struct acpi_ras2_shared_memory  __iomem *generic_comm_base;
+	struct acpi_ras2_patrol_scrub_parameter __iomem *patrol_scrub_params;
+
+	if (!ras2_ctx || !ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	generic_comm_base = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr;
+	patrol_scrub_params = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr + sizeof(*generic_comm_base);
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	generic_comm_base->set_capabilities[0] = RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB;
+	/* send command for reading RAS2 capabilities */
+	ret = ras2_send_pcc_cmd(ras2_ctx, RAS2_PCC_CMD_EXEC);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: ras2_send_pcc_cmd failed\n", __func__);
+		return ret;
+	}

Similarly, since firmware populates the feature bitmask on
initialization, it would seem that we do not need to send
a PCC CMD EXEC to read RAS2 capabilities.
+
+	if (!(generic_comm_base->features[0] & RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB) ||
+	    !(generic_comm_base->num_parameter_blocks)) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: Platform does not support HW Patrol Scrubber\n", __func__);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (!patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[1]) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: Invalid requested address range, \
+			requested_address_range[0]=0x%llx \
+			requested_address_range[1]=0x%llx\n",
+			__func__,
+			patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[0],
+			patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[1]);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	generic_comm_base->set_capabilities[0] = RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB;
+	patrol_scrub_params->header.type = RAS2_TYPE_PATROL_SCRUB;

header.type should already be populated by firmware. Is assigning it
here necessary?
+	patrol_scrub_params->patrol_scrub_command = RAS2_GET_PATROL_PARAMETERS;
+
+	/* send command for reading the HW patrol scrub parameters */
+	ret = ras2_send_pcc_cmd(ras2_ctx, RAS2_PCC_CMD_EXEC);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: failed to read HW patrol scrub parameters\n",
+			__func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* copy output scrub parameters */
+	params->addr_base = patrol_scrub_params->actual_address_range[0];
+	params->addr_size = patrol_scrub_params->actual_address_range[1];
+	params->flags = patrol_scrub_params->flags;
+	params->rate = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_RATE_OUT_MASK,
+				 patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_out);
+	min_supp_scrub_rate = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_MIN_RATE_OUT_MASK,
+					patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_out);
+	max_supp_scrub_rate = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_MAX_RATE_OUT_MASK,
+					patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_out);
+	snprintf(params->rate_avail, RAS2_MAX_RATE_RANGE_LENGTH,
+		 "%d-%d", min_supp_scrub_rate, max_supp_scrub_rate);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ras2_enable_patrol_scrub(struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx, bool enable)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct ras2_scrub_params params;
+	struct acpi_ras2_shared_memory  __iomem *generic_comm_base;
+	u8 scrub_rate_to_set, min_supp_scrub_rate, max_supp_scrub_rate;
+	struct acpi_ras2_patrol_scrub_parameter __iomem *patrol_scrub_params;
+
+	if (!ras2_ctx || !ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	generic_comm_base = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr;
+	patrol_scrub_params = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr + sizeof(*generic_comm_base);
+
+	if (enable) {
+		ret = ras2_get_patrol_scrub_params(ras2_ctx, &params);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	generic_comm_base->set_capabilities[0] = RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB;
+	patrol_scrub_params->header.type = RAS2_TYPE_PATROL_SCRUB;

header.type should already be populated by firmware. Is assigning it
here necessary?
+
+	if (enable) {
+		patrol_scrub_params->patrol_scrub_command = RAS2_START_PATROL_SCRUBBER;
+		patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[0] = params.addr_base;
+		patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[1] = params.addr_size;
+
+		scrub_rate_to_set = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_RATE_IN_MASK,
+					      patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_in);
+		min_supp_scrub_rate = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_MIN_RATE_OUT_MASK,
+						patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_out);
+		max_supp_scrub_rate = FIELD_GET(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_MAX_RATE_OUT_MASK,
+						patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_out);
+		if (scrub_rate_to_set < min_supp_scrub_rate ||
+		    scrub_rate_to_set > max_supp_scrub_rate) {
+			dev_warn(ras2_ctx->dev,
+				 "patrol scrub rate to set is out of the supported range\n");
+			dev_warn(ras2_ctx->dev,
+				 "min_supp_scrub_rate=%d max_supp_scrub_rate=%d\n",
+				 min_supp_scrub_rate, max_supp_scrub_rate);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		patrol_scrub_params->patrol_scrub_command = RAS2_STOP_PATROL_SCRUBBER;
+	}
+
+	/* send command for enable/disable HW patrol scrub */
+	ret = ras2_send_pcc_cmd(ras2_ctx, RAS2_PCC_CMD_EXEC);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to enable/disable the HW patrol scrub\n", __func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ras2_enable_background_scrub(struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx, bool enable)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct acpi_ras2_shared_memory  __iomem *generic_comm_base;
+	struct acpi_ras2_patrol_scrub_parameter __iomem *patrol_scrub_params;
+
+	if (!ras2_ctx || !ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	generic_comm_base = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr;
+	patrol_scrub_params = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr + sizeof(*generic_comm_base);
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	generic_comm_base->set_capabilities[0] = RAS2_SUPPORT_HW_PARTOL_SCRUB;
+	patrol_scrub_params->header.type = RAS2_TYPE_PATROL_SCRUB;

header.type should already be populated by firmware. Is assigning it
here necessary?
+	patrol_scrub_params->patrol_scrub_command = RAS2_START_PATROL_SCRUBBER;
+
+	patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_in &= ~RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_EN_BACKGROUND;
+	patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_in |= FIELD_PREP(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_EN_BACKGROUND,
+							   enable);
+
+	/* send command for enable/disable HW patrol scrub */
+	ret = ras2_send_pcc_cmd(ras2_ctx, RAS2_PCC_CMD_EXEC);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev,
+			"%s: failed to enable/disable background patrol scrubbing\n",
+			__func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+static int ras2_set_patrol_scrub_params(struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx,
+					struct ras2_scrub_params *params, u8 param_type)
+{
+	struct acpi_ras2_shared_memory  __iomem *generic_comm_base;
+	struct acpi_ras2_patrol_scrub_parameter __iomem *patrol_scrub_params;
+
+	if (!ras2_ctx || !ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	generic_comm_base = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr;
+	patrol_scrub_params = ras2_ctx->pcc_comm_addr + sizeof(*generic_comm_base);
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	patrol_scrub_params->header.type = RAS2_TYPE_PATROL_SCRUB;
+	if (param_type == RAS2_MEM_SCRUB_PARAM_ADDR_BASE && params->addr_base) {
+		patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[0] = params->addr_base;
+	} else if (param_type == RAS2_MEM_SCRUB_PARAM_ADDR_SIZE && params->addr_size) {
+		patrol_scrub_params->requested_address_range[1] = params->addr_size;
+	} else if (param_type == RAS2_MEM_SCRUB_PARAM_RATE) {
+		patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_in &= ~RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_RATE_IN_MASK;
+		patrol_scrub_params->scrub_params_in |= FIELD_PREP(RAS2_PATROL_SCRUB_RATE_IN_MASK,
+								   params->rate);
+	} else {
+		dev_err(ras2_ctx->dev, "Invalid patrol scrub parameter to set\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct ras2_hw_scrub_ops ras2_hw_ops = {
+	.enable_scrub = ras2_enable_patrol_scrub,
+	.enable_background_scrub = ras2_enable_background_scrub,
+	.get_scrub_params = ras2_get_patrol_scrub_params,
+	.set_scrub_params = ras2_set_patrol_scrub_params,
+};
+
+static const struct scrub_ops ras2_scrub_ops = {
+	.is_visible = ras2_hw_scrub_is_visible,
+	.read = ras2_hw_scrub_read,
+	.write = ras2_hw_scrub_write,
+	.read_string = ras2_hw_scrub_read_strings,
+};
+
+static DEFINE_IDA(ras2_ida);
+
+static void devm_ras2_release(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx = ctx;
+
+	ida_free(&ras2_ida, ras2_ctx->id);
+	ras2_unregister_pcc_channel(ras2_ctx);
+}
+
+static int ras2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret, id;
+	struct mbox_client *cl;
+	struct device *hw_scrub_dev;
+	struct ras2_context *ras2_ctx;
+	char scrub_name[RAS2_MAX_NAME_LENGTH];
+
+	ras2_ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ras2_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ras2_ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ras2_ctx->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	ras2_ctx->ops = &ras2_hw_ops;
+	spin_lock_init(&ras2_ctx->spinlock);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ras2_ctx);
+
+	cl = &ras2_ctx->mbox_client;
+	/* Request mailbox channel */
+	cl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	cl->tx_done = ras2_tx_done;
+	cl->knows_txdone = true;
+	ras2_ctx->pcc_subspace_idx = *((int *)pdev->dev.platform_data);
+	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pcc-subspace-id=%d\n", ras2_ctx->pcc_subspace_idx);
+	ret = ras2_register_pcc_channel(ras2_ctx);

In our enabling activities, we have found a challenge here.
Our hardware has a single PCC channel corresponding to a single
platform-wide scrub interface. This driver, following the ACPI spec,
will create a new scrub node for each NUMA node. However, for us,
this means that each scrub device will try to map the same PCC channel,
and this causes an error.
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, devm_ras2_release, ras2_ctx);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ras2_is_patrol_scrub_support(ras2_ctx)) {
+		id = ida_alloc(&ras2_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (id < 0)
+			return id;
+		ras2_ctx->id = id;
+		snprintf(scrub_name, sizeof(scrub_name), "%s%d", RAS2_SCRUB, id);
+		dev_set_name(&pdev->dev, RAS2_ID_FORMAT, id);
+		hw_scrub_dev = devm_scrub_device_register(&pdev->dev, scrub_name,
+							  ras2_ctx, &ras2_scrub_ops,
+							  0, NULL);
+		if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hw_scrub_dev))
+			return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hw_scrub_dev);
+	}
+	ras2_ctx->scrub_dev = hw_scrub_dev;
+
+	return 0;
+}













[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux