RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:18:10 -0700
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxx>, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240319120026.2246389-3-rrichter@amd.com>
References: <20240319120026.2246389-1-rrichter@amd.com> <20240319120026.2246389-3-rrichter@amd.com>

Robert Richter wrote:
> The CEDT contains similar entries as the SRAT. For diagnostic reasons
> print the CEDT same style as the SRAT.

How about move this to pr_debug()? We have lived without this for a
significant amount of time and it is not clear that CXL debug scenarios
have been hampered by not having this in the log by default.

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates
  - From: Robert Richter
- [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)
  - From: Robert Richter

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks()
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI/NUMA: Remove architecture dependent remainings
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Power Management] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]