On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 08:46:49 -0600
Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey Jonathan, thanks for taking a look!
>
> On 3/7/24 6:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:27:02 -0600
> > Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Remove CXL protocol error types from the EINJ module and move them to
> >> a new einj_cxl module. The einj_cxl module implements the necessary
> >> handling for CXL protocol error injection and exposes an API for the
> >> CXL core to use said functionality. Because the CXL error types
> >> require special handling, only allow them to be injected through the
> >> einj_cxl module and return an error when attempting to inject through
> >> "regular" EINJ.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@xxxxxxx>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Some minor comments inline given you are doing a v15 (yikes!)
> >
>
> Yeah I know :(.
>
With headers tidied up.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >> + { BIT(13), "CXL.cache Protocol Uncorrectable non-fatal" },
> >> + { BIT(14), "CXL.cache Protocol Uncorrectable fatal" },
> >> + { BIT(15), "CXL.mem Protocol Correctable" },
> >> + { BIT(16), "CXL.mem Protocol Uncorrectable non-fatal" },
> >> + { BIT(17), "CXL.mem Protocol Uncorrectable fatal" },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +int einj_cxl_available_error_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >> +{
> >> + int cxl_err, rc;
> >> + u32 available_error_type = 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (!einj_initialized)
> >> + return -ENXIO;
> >> +
> >> + rc = einj_get_available_error_type(&available_error_type);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> +
> >> + for (int pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einj_cxl_error_type_string); pos++) {
> >> + cxl_err = ACPI_EINJ_CXL_CACHE_CORRECTABLE << pos;
> > Hmm. This is a little ugly.
> > Could do something like the following bit it's of similar level of ugly
> > so up to you.
> >
> > int bit_pos = ACPI_EINJ_CXL_CACHE_CORRECTABLE;
> > for_each_bit_set_bit_from(bit_pos, &available_error_type,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(einj_cxl_error_type_string)) {
> > int pos = bit_pos - ACPI_EINJ_CXL_CACHE_CORRECTABLE;
> >
>
> I agree it's ugly. I think this version has the added benfit of parity
> with einj_available_error_type_show() in einj-core.c, so I think it's
> better to keep it this way if it's the same to you.
>
Sure. We can always (maybe) tidy them both up later :)
J
