On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote: > > x86/arm64/loongarch would select ACPI_NUMA by default and riscv > > would do the same thing, so the dependency is no longer needed > > since these are the four architectures that support ACPI. > > > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > index 849c2bd820b9..2bf47ad1ec9b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ > > config ACPI_NUMA > > bool "NUMA support" > > depends on NUMA > > - depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH) > > default y if ARM64 > > Can we remove the prompt as well and make this a > hidden option? I think this is now always selected > when it can be used anyway. > > If we make it > > def_bool NUMA && !X86 > > then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA > can also go away. > Good idea! Shall we include the ACPI in the def_bool definition? > Arnd
