On Tuesday, 18 of March 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Tim Elliott wrote: > > I am seeing the same problem on my Lenovo 3000 v100. The function keys > > stopped working. > > > > tim@tim-len:~$ cat /proc/interrupts > > CPU0 CPU1 > > 0: 164105 0 IO-APIC-edge timer > > 1: 12560 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > > 9: 6 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi > > 12: 117534 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > > 14: 51 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0 > > 16: 31 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, > > i915@pci:0000:00:02.0 > > 18: 121892 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3, iwl3945 > > 19: 36197 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2, ahci > > 20: 7931 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0 > > 22: 11071 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi sdhc0:slot0, HDA Intel > > 23: 5 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb5 > > NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts > > LOC: 11296 73879 Local timer interrupts > > RES: 23199 49164 Rescheduling interrupts > > CAL: 297 27033 function call interrupts > > TLB: 838 1286 TLB shootdowns > > TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts > > THR: 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts > > SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts > > ERR: 0 > > > > The problem goes away when reverting 2c81ce4c9c37b910210f2640c28e98a0c398dc26 > > > > Reverting the above and applying the patch in comment #38 of bug #9998 > > also works (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998). > reverting the above and patch in comment #38 of #9998 are the same thing. > I am really interested if after revert (or application of #38) you notice a > difference in interrupt count before and after applying #37 from #9998. What is the relationship between this problem and bug #10279? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
