Hi! > > So... we do prepare() but it detects new child, so it returns -EAGAIN. > > so we call complete() based on description above > > ...and then we call prepare() to suspend again? > > You misunderstood (maybe the comment needs to be clarified as above). Yes, please :-). > If prepare() returns any error (including -EAGAIN) then complete() does > not get called. If prepare() returns successfully but the PM core > detects that a new child was added while prepare() was running, then we > call complete(), suspend the child, and call prepare() again. Ok. > > > + * @suspend: Executed before putting the system into a sleep state in which the > > > + * contents of main memory are preserved. Quiesce the device, put it into > > > > content....is? > > It's okay to use "contents" -- analogous to the table of contents in a > book. It's one of those weird corner cases where either alternative is > acceptable. Ok -- I guess I should get that english course ;-). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
