Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, at 03:58, Haibo Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 03:32, Haibo Xu wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>> >  config ACPI_NUMA
>> >       bool "NUMA support"
>> >       depends on NUMA
>> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
>> > +     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
>>
>> The dependency is no longer needed now since these are
>> the four architectures that support ACPI now that IA64
>> is gone.
>>
>> All of them also 'select ACPI_NUMA' by default, though on
>> x86 this can still be disabled by manually turning off
>> CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA. I suspect we don't actually ever
>> want to turn it off on x86 either, so I guess the Kconfig
>> option can just be removed entirely.
>>
>
> Good catch! Will revert the change in the next version.
>
> To remove the dependency entirely, I think we need a separate patch for it.
> What's your opinion?

Agreed, that last bit would need to be acked by the x86
maintainers then, as it only affects them in practice.

     Arnd





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux