Hi Bartosz,
Le mardi 05 septembre 2023 à 20:53 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using
> gpio_device_find().
> Update the swnode GPIO code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-
> swnode.c
> index b5a6eaf3729b..56c8519be538 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
> @@ -31,31 +31,26 @@ static void swnode_format_propname(const char
> *con_id, char *propname,
> strscpy(propname, "gpios", max_size);
> }
>
> -static int swnode_gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *chip, void
> *data)
> +static struct gpio_device *swnode_get_gpio_device(struct
> fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> {
> - return !strcmp(chip->label, data);
> -}
> + const struct software_node *gdev_node;
> + struct gpio_device *gdev;
>
> -static struct gpio_chip *swnode_get_chip(struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode)
> -{
> - const struct software_node *chip_node;
> - struct gpio_chip *chip;
> -
> - chip_node = to_software_node(fwnode);
> - if (!chip_node || !chip_node->name)
> + gdev_node = to_software_node(fwnode);
> + if (!gdev_node || !gdev_node->name)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - chip = gpiochip_find((void *)chip_node->name,
> swnode_gpiochip_match_name);
> - return chip ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label((void *)gdev_node->name);
> + return gdev ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> }
>
> struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> const char *con_id, unsigned int
> idx,
> unsigned long *flags)
> {
> + struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
> const struct software_node *swnode;
> struct fwnode_reference_args args;
> - struct gpio_chip *chip;
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> char propname[32]; /* 32 is max size of property name */
> int error;
> @@ -77,12 +72,12 @@ struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct
> fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return ERR_PTR(error);
> }
>
> - chip = swnode_get_chip(args.fwnode);
> + gdev = swnode_get_gpio_device(args.fwnode);
> fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
> - if (IS_ERR(chip))
> - return ERR_CAST(chip);
> + if (IS_ERR(gdev))
> + return ERR_CAST(gdev);
I'm a bit late to the party, sorry.
I'm looking at how __free() should be used to use it in my own
patchset, and I was wondering if this code actually works.
What happens if swnode_get_gpio_device() returns an error pointer?
Won't that cause a call to gpio_device_put() with the invalid pointer?
Cheers,
-Paul
>
> - desc = gpiochip_get_desc(chip, args.args[0]);
> + desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gdev->chip, args.args[0]);
> *flags = args.args[1]; /* We expect native GPIO flags */
>
> pr_debug("%s: parsed '%s' property of node '%pfwP[%d]' -
> status (%d)\n",
