Re: [PATCH RFC v3 18/21] ACPI: processor: Only call arch_unregister_cpu() if HOTPLUG_CPU is selected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 04:50:09PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:50:43 +0000
> Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The kbuild robot points out that configurations without HOTPLUG_CPU
> > selected can try to build acpi_processor_post_eject() without success
> > as arch_unregister_cpu() is not defined.
> > 
> > Check this explicitly. This will be merged into:
> > | ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
> > for any subsequent posting.
> > 
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This should probably be squashed into an earlier patch.
> 
> Agreed. If not
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not convinced that "ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler
for cpu hotplug" is the correct commit to squash this into.

As far as acpi_processor.c is concerned, This commit merely renames
acpi_processor_remove() to be acpi_processor_post_eject(). The function
references arch_unregister_cpu() before and after this change, and its
build is dependent on CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU being defined.

Commit "ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED()"
removed the ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU surrounding
acpi_processor_post_eject, and that symbol depends on
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, so I think this commit is also fine.

Commit "ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present"
rewrites the function - the original body gets called
acpi_processor_make_not_present() and a new acpi_processor_post_eject()
is created. At this point, it doesn't reference arch_unregister_cpu().

Commit "ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled
bit" adds a reference to arch_unregister_cpu() in this new
acpi_processor_post_eject() - so I think this is the correct commit
this change should be merged into.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux