Re: suspend order - again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, 14 of March 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> I just found a system (Asus A6B00VC) suffers a regression of suspend
> order adjust. In the system, if _PTS is called before pci device
> suspend, pci config read of slot 01:01.0 will always return 0xffffffff
> (only this slot, not other devices). Adding acpi_new_pts_ordering fixes
> this. I checked the log, _PTS itself doesn't generate any pci config
> access, it appears _PTS call into SMBIOS and changes something. Note,
> this is ACPI 1.0 table. Should we just blacklist the system or re-think
> the suspend order?

I don't want to change the ordering of code.  It's been changed for many times
and it always turned out that some systems didn't work.

If we can implement the blacklisting in a reasonable fashion, I'd prefer to do
just that.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux