From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> It is somewhat better to use the size of the first array element for computing the size of the entire array than to rely on the array element data type definition knowledge and the former is also consistent with the array allocation in acpi_evaluate_reference(), so modify the code accordingly. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/utils.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ bool acpi_handle_list_equal(struct acpi_ { return list1->count == list2->count && !memcmp(list1->handles, list2->handles, - list1->count * sizeof(acpi_handle)); + list1->count * sizeof(*list1->handles)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_handle_list_equal);