On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 01:05:58PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I'm fine with this as some hacky backport, but I don't want to see > this cross-layer leakage left in the next merge window. > > ie we should still do my other series on top of and reverting this. > > I've poked at moving parts of it under probe and I think we can do > substantial amounts in about two more series and a tidy a bunch of > other stuff too. Applied this for v6.7. Before I am going to apply any series on-top I want to see you and Robin agree on a general direction for this moving forward. Regards, Joerg
