Hi Linus, On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 2:20 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 7:09 PM Sam Edwards <cfsworks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I am not an ACPI subsystem maintainer, but my understanding is that the > > files in include/acpi/ are copied verbatim from ACPICA, so any change to > > those files will have to be sent to the ACPICA project and wouldn't be > > accepted here. > > > > More likely, we'd want to do something about the circular-include > > situation between linux/fw_table.h<->linux/acpi.h. > > I agree but I have no idea how to fix that really, should I just send > a revert instead so the authors can get some time to figure it out? > Just want to confirm that linux-mainline and linux-next builds are broken for my ARM64 board as well, because of the commit you pin-pointed. I vote for reverting it and letting the author rework it properly. On a side note: I'm surprised there are no bots or automatic CI builds out there testing the kernel builds with baremetal toolchains. Can't believe everyone's using Linux toolchain, the kernel is supposed to be baremetal project. > Yours, > Linus Walleij
