Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: WMI: Clean up handling of spec violating data blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



applied

thanks,
-len

On Sunday 24 February 2008, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> Acer violate the ACPI-WMI spec by declaring some of their data blocks as
> expensive, but with no corresponding WCxx method. There is already some
> workaround code in to handle the initial WCxx call (we just ignore a
> failure here); but we need to properly check if the second, "clean up",
> WCxx call is actually needed or not, rather than fail simply because it
> isn't there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/wmi.c |   10 ++++++----
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wmi.c b/drivers/acpi/wmi.c
> index efacc9f..c33b1c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/wmi.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
>  {
>  	struct guid_block *block = NULL;
>  	struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL;
> -	acpi_handle handle;
> +	acpi_handle handle, wc_handle;
>  	acpi_status status, wc_status = AE_ERROR;
>  	struct acpi_object_list input, wc_input;
>  	union acpi_object wc_params[1], wq_params[1];
> @@ -338,8 +338,10 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
>  		 * expensive, but have no corresponding WCxx method. So we
>  		 * should not fail if this happens.
>  		 */
> -		wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method,
> -			&wc_input, NULL);
> +		wc_status = acpi_get_handle(handle, wc_method, &wc_handle);
> +		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status))
> +			wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method,
> +				&wc_input, NULL);
>  	}
>  
>  	strcpy(method, "WQ");
> @@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
>  	 * If ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE, call the relevant WCxx method, even if
>  	 * the WQxx method failed - we should disable collection anyway.
>  	 */
> -	if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && wc_status) {
> +	if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) {
>  		wc_params[0].integer.value = 0;
>  		status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle,
>  		wc_method, &wc_input, NULL);
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux