Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI: APEI: Use ERST timeout for slow devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:32:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So there are 3 designated reviewers for APEI: Tony Luck, Borislav
> Petkov and James Morse.  I need an ACK or Reviewed-by from one of
> them, so I can proceed with an APEI patch.

Here's what I see:

cat /tmp/patch | ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:PSTORE FILESYSTEM)
Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:PSTORE FILESYSTEM)
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:PSTORE FILESYSTEM)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> (unknown:ACPI APEI)
Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ACPI APEI)
James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> (reviewer:ACPI APEI)
Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ACPI APEI)

so I'm guessing Kees, Tony, Guilherme ...

>From what I can see, the change itself is making me ask more questions:

When I see "may" in commit messages "Slow devices such as flash may not
meet the default 1ms timeout value" then I wanna know what devices are
those?

What is the actual use case here?

Upthread there's a question about the ACPI spec. That should be
explained too. Because I have no clue what "the ERST max execution time
value" is.

And so on.

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux