On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:10:05PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> acpi_get_rhct() currently returns pointer to acpi_table_header
> structure. But since this is specific to RHCT, return pointer to
> acpi_table_rhct structure itself.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/riscv/rhct.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/rhct.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/rhct.c
> index b280b3e9c7d9..489b0e93b1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/rhct.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/rhct.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> -static struct acpi_table_header *acpi_get_rhct(void)
> +static struct acpi_table_rhct *acpi_get_rhct(void)
> {
> static struct acpi_table_header *rhct;
> acpi_status status;
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static struct acpi_table_header *acpi_get_rhct(void)
> }
> }
>
> - return rhct;
> + return (struct acpi_table_rhct *)rhct;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table, unsigned int cpu, const
> BUG_ON(acpi_disabled);
>
> if (!table) {
> - rhct = (struct acpi_table_rhct *)acpi_get_rhct();
> + rhct = acpi_get_rhct();
> if (!rhct)
> return -ENOENT;
> } else {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
