First, the subject is misleading, because the patch doesn't address
any errors, but cleans up the usage of white space.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 6:32 AM <chenguohua@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch:
Why does it make sense to run checkpatch on the existing code?
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> ERROR: space required after that ';' (ctx:VxV)
>
> Signed-off-by: GuoHua Cheng <chenguohua@xxxxxxx>
Please fix the changelog to simply state that it cleans up the usage
of white space so it is consistent with the kernel coding style.
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 9bcf5641a7cf..b55a8ac627e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ acpi_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> }
>
> #define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn) \
> - static const void * __acpi_table_##name[] \
> + static const void *__acpi_table_##name[] \
> __attribute__((unused)) \
> = { (void *) table_id, \
> (void *) subtable, \
> @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ acpi_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> (void *) fn, \
> (void *) data }
>
> -#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r;})
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r; })
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE
> --
