Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: acpiphp: Allow built-in attention drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



D Scott Phillips <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Starting from the introduction of the attention callback in acpiphp, a
> non-zero struct module *owner field has been required in
> acpiphp_register_attention(). Then intent seemed to be that the core code
> could then hold a refcount on the module while invoking a callback.
>
> This check accidentally precludes the possiblity of attention callbacks to
> drivers which are built-in.
>
> Remove the check on `struct module *owner` in acpiphp_register_attention()
> so that attention callbacks can also be registered from built-in drivers.

Hi Bjorn, ping on these, thanks

Scott

>
> Signed-off-by: D Scott Phillips <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - new patch in the series
>
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_core.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_core.c
> index c02257f4b61c4..9dad14e80bcf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_core.c
> @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ int acpiphp_register_attention(struct acpiphp_attention_info *info)
>  {
>  	int retval = -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (info && info->owner && info->set_attn &&
> -			info->get_attn && !attention_info) {
> +	if (info && info->set_attn && info->get_attn && !attention_info) {
>  		retval = 0;
>  		attention_info = info;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.41.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux