On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:18 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 21/09/2023 19:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In order to reduce code duplication, merge update_passive_devices() and
> > update_active_devices() into one function called update_trip_devices()
> > that will be used for updating both the passive and active trip points.
> >
> > No intentional functional impact.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
> > #define ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE 10
> > #define ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_LIMIT_STR_LEN 65
> >
> > +#define ACPI_THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE (-1)
> > +
> > /*
> > * This exception is thrown out in two cases:
> > * 1.An invalid trip point becomes invalid or a valid trip point becomes invalid
> > @@ -202,18 +204,25 @@ static void acpi_thermal_update_passive_
> > ACPI_THERMAL_TRIPS_EXCEPTION(tz, "state");
> > }
> >
> > -static bool update_passive_devices(struct acpi_thermal *tz, bool compare)
> > +static bool update_trip_devices(struct acpi_thermal *tz,
> > + struct acpi_thermal_trip *acpi_trip,
> > + int index, bool compare)
> > {
> > - struct acpi_thermal_trip *acpi_trip = &tz->trips.passive.trip;
> > struct acpi_handle_list devices;
> > + char method[] = "_PSL";
> > acpi_status status;
> >
> > + if (index != ACPI_THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE) {
> > + method[1] = 'A';
> > + method[2] = 'L';
> > + method[3] = '0' + index;
> > + }
>
> Could be index > 9 ?
I can add a check, but it will never be called with index > 9 anyway.
