On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:07:21PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Getting the GPIO descriptor directly from the gpio_chip struct is
> dangerous as we don't take the reference to the underlying GPIO device.
> In order to start working towards removing gpiochip_get_desc(), let's
> provide a safer variant that works with an existing reference to struct
> gpio_device.
...
> +struct gpio_desc *
> +gpio_device_get_desc(struct gpio_device *gdev, unsigned int hwnum)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = gdev->chip;
I prefer
struct gpio_chip *gc;
> + /*
> + * FIXME: This will be locked once we protect gdev->chip everywhere
> + * with SRCU.
> + */
gc = gdev->chip;
as it is more robust against changes in between and easier to read and
understand in the code what's going on. With decoupled assignment in this case
it's harder to see at the flash glance if the gc is parameter of the function
or being derived from somewhere else.
> + if (!gc)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> if (hwnum >= gdev->ngpio)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> return &gdev->descs[hwnum];
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
