From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in
acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk
+++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -899,9 +899,10 @@ static void __ref acpi_processor_hotplug
switch (event) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
- printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Processor driver received %s event\n",
(event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
- "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+ "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));
if (!is_processor_present(handle))
break;
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
