Re: [Patch 1/2] ACPI: thermal: Add Thermal fast Sampling Period (_TFP) support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 19/08/23 00:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:30 AM Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Add support for Thermal fast Sampling Period (_TFP) for Passive cooling.
As per UEFI spec,

You mean the ACPI spec I suppose?  It would be good to give the
relevant section number and title.


Yes, It's the ACPI Spec 6.4. Section and title are "11.4.17. _TFP (Thermal fast Sampling Period)". I will add it in description in v2.
Thank you for correcting.

  _TFP overrides the "Thermal Sampling Period (_TSP)"
  if both are present in a Thermal zone.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
index f9f6ebb08fdb..5dee3722509c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct acpi_thermal_passive {
         unsigned long temperature;
         unsigned long tc1;
         unsigned long tc2;
-       unsigned long tsp;
+       unsigned long sampling_period;
         bool valid;
  };

@@ -289,11 +289,18 @@ static int acpi_thermal_trips_update(struct acpi_thermal *tz, int flag)
                                         tz->trips.passive.tc2 = tmp;

                                 status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle,
-                                                              "_TSP", NULL, &tmp);
-                               if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-                                       tz->trips.passive.valid = false;
-                               else
-                                       tz->trips.passive.tsp = tmp;
+                                                              "_TFP", NULL, &tmp);
+                               if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+                                       status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle,
+                                                                      "_TSP", NULL, &tmp);
+                                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+                                               tz->trips.passive.valid = false;
+                                       else
+                                               tz->trips.passive.sampling_period = tmp * 100;
+
+                               } else {
+                                       tz->trips.passive.sampling_period = tmp;
+                               }
                         }
                 }
         }
@@ -765,7 +772,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
         if (tz->trips.passive.valid)
                 tz->thermal_zone = thermal_zone_device_register("acpitz", trips, 0, tz,
                                                                 &acpi_thermal_zone_ops, NULL,
-                                                               tz->trips.passive.tsp * 100,
+                                                               tz->trips.passive.sampling_period,
                                                                 tz->polling_frequency * 100);
         else
                 tz->thermal_zone =
--

So this needs to be rebased on top of the current linux-next branch in
linux-pm.git or on top of the acpi-thermal branch in there.

Will rebase and send v2.

Thank you,
Sumit Gupta




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux