On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 06:32:18AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Biju Das wrote: ... > > * > > * Besides the fact that some drivers abuse the device ID driver_data > > type > > * and claim it to be integer, for the bus specific ID tables the > > driver_data > > * may be defined as kernel_ulong_t. For these tables 0 is a valid > > response, > > * but not for this function. It's recommended to covert those either to > > Will fix the typo covert->convert Thank you! > > avoid > > * 0 or use a real pointer to the predefined driver data. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
