On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:02:27PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers: fwnode: Extend > > device_get_match_data() to struct bus_type > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 09:37:20AM +0100, Biju Das wrote: ... > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > You can't just throw one's SoB tag without clear understanding what's > > going on here (either wrong authorship or missing Co-developed-by > > or...?). > > Dmitry feels instead of having separate bus based match_data() like > i2c_get_match_data[2] and spi_get_device_match_data[3], it is better to have > a generic approach like a single API device_get_match_data() for getting > match_data for OF/ACPI/I2C/SPI tables. > > So, he came with a proposal and shared some code here[1]. Yes, I'm pretty much following the discussion. > Since,I have send this patch, I put my signed -off. I'm not talking about this. There is no evidence that Dmitry gives you any approval to use or clear SoB tag. Again, you may not do like this. > If this patch is accepted, then we can get rid of bus based match_data. This is unrelated to what I talking about. > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20230717131756.240645-2-biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#25436207 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
