Hi Andy, On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 01:48:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 10:27:55AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 01:06:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > > > + dw9719->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd"); > > > > + if (IS_ERR(dw9719->regulator)) > > > > + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(dw9719->regulator), > > > > > > With > > > > > > struct device *dev = &client->dev; > > > > > > code may look neater. > > > > I prefer it as-is. > > May I ask what the technical rationale behind your preferences? Esp. taking > into account how picky you are for 80 character limit. The device is already available via &client->dev. Sure, you do remove a few characters per line but also introduce a new variable to be aware of. In this case there's no line break that would be affected. That being said, I certainly don't have a strong opinion on this. If Hans prefers to have a local variable for this I'm totally fine with that. I just think there's no need to. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus