On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:17:07PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:30:10PM +0800, 运辉崔 wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > (This is a reply to a non-existent cover letter.) > > > > This has been discussed many times with Ard, Please refer to : > > https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20230426034001.16-1-cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > There's nothing in that thread that convinces me this is a good idea. > Indeed, afaict from that thread, Ard nacked this. It was only when it > was suggested that arch/riscv would own the code, that he stopped > complaining about it. I wouldn't call that an endorsement. In fact, he expressly said that it would then be up to the RISC-V maintainers as to what to do: But please check with the RISC-V maintainers if they are up for this, and whether they want to see this mechanism contributed to one of the pertinent specifications.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
