In the event a new preferred PM profile value is introduced it's best for code to be able to defensively guard against it so that the wrong settings don't get applied on a new system that uses this profile but ancient kernels. Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Gautham Ranjal Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx> Link: https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#fixed-acpi-description-table-fadt Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> --- v2->v3: * Drop new symbols (they fold into patch 2) * Update commit message * Add Ray's tag --- include/acpi/actbl.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl.h b/include/acpi/actbl.h index e5dfb6f4de52..451f6276da49 100644 --- a/include/acpi/actbl.h +++ b/include/acpi/actbl.h @@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ enum acpi_preferred_pm_profiles { PM_SOHO_SERVER = 5, PM_APPLIANCE_PC = 6, PM_PERFORMANCE_SERVER = 7, - PM_TABLET = 8 + PM_TABLET = 8, + NR_PM_PROFILES = 9 }; /* Values for sleep_status and sleep_control registers (V5+ FADT) */ -- 2.34.1