Hi Mario,
On 5/23/23 18:21, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:08 AM
>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>;
>> Natikar, Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/x86/amd: pmc: Use pm_pr_dbg() for
>> suspend related messages
>>
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> On 5/22/23 22:00, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> Using pm_pr_dbg() allows users to toggle
>> `/sys/power/pm_debug_messages`
>>> as a single knob to turn on messages that amd-pmc can emit to aid in
>>> any s2idle debugging.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c
>>> index 427905714f79..1304cd6f13f6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c
>>> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_idlemask_read(struct
>> amd_pmc_dev *pdev, struct device *dev,
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (dev)
>>> - dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "SMU idlemask s0i3: 0x%x\n", val);
>>> + pm_pr_dbg("SMU idlemask s0i3: 0x%x\n", val);
>>>
>>> if (s)
>>> seq_printf(s, "SMU idlemask : 0x%x\n", val);
>>
>> This does not compile, amd/pmc.c may be build as an amd-pmc.ko module
>> and currently the pm_debug_messages_on flag used by pm_pr_dbg()
>> is not exported to modules:
>>
>> CC [M] drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.o
>> LD [M] drivers/platform/x86/amd/amd-pmc.o
>> MODPOST Module.symvers
>> ERROR: modpost: "pm_debug_messages_on"
>> [drivers/platform/x86/amd/amd-pmc.ko] undefined!
>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:136: Module.symvers] Error 1
>> make: *** [Makefile:1978: modpost] Error 2
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>
> My apologies, yes I was compiling in when testing. Let me ask if this
> series makes sense and is "generally" agreeable though.
I have no objections against this series, otherwise I don't really
have a strong opinion on this series.
If this makes sense and if exporting pm_debug_messages_on is ok
is Rafael's call to make IMHO.
Rafael ?
Regards,
Hans
