Dan Williams wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ACPICA commit 44f1af0664599e87bebc3a1260692baa27b2f264 > > > > Similar to "Replace one-element array with flexible-array", replace the > > 1-element array with a proper flexible array member as defined by C99. > > > > This allows the code to operate without tripping compile-time and run- > > time bounds checkers (e.g. via __builtin_object_size(), -fsanitize=bounds, > > and/or -fstrict-flex-arrays=3). > > > > The sizeof() uses with struct acpi_nfit_flush_address and struct > > acpi_nfit_smbios have been adjusted to drop the open-coded subtraction > > of the trailing single element. The result is no binary differences in > > .text nor .data sections. > > > > Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/44f1af06 > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> Unit tests say NAK, though. This causes a regression, but I think I see where. Will send a fixed patch in a bit.
