On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:46 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ACPI 6.3 introduced the online capable bit, and also introduced MADT
> version 5.
>
> This was used to distinguish whether the offset storing online capable
> could be used. However ACPI 6.2b has MADT version "45" which is for
> an errata version of the ACPI 6.2 spec. This means that the Linux code
> for detecting availability of MADT will mistakingly flag ACPI 6.2b as
> supporting online capable which is inaccurate as it's an ACPI 6.3 feature.
>
> Instead use the FADT major and minor revision fields to distingush this.
>
> Reported-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkob <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
s/Petkob/Petkov/ I suppose?
Would have been nice to CC this to linux-acpi (done now).
Anyway, x86 guys, are you going to handle this or do you want me to do that?
> Fixes: aa06e20f1be6 ("x86/ACPI: Don't add CPUs that are not online capable")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 1c38174b5f01..e92e3292fef7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,10 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>
> pr_debug("Local APIC address 0x%08x\n", madt->address);
> }
> - if (madt->header.revision >= 5)
> +
> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision > 6 ||
> + (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision == 6 &&
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.minor_revision >= 3))
> acpi_support_online_capable = true;
>
> default_acpi_madt_oem_check(madt->header.oem_id,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
