OSPM executes an EXECUTE_OPERATION action to instruct the platform to begin the injection operation, then executes a GET_COMMAND_STATUS action to determine the status of the completed operation. The ACPI Specification documented error codes[1] are: 0 = Success (Linux #define EINJ_STATUS_SUCCESS) 1 = Unknown failure (Linux #define EINJ_STATUS_FAIL) 2 = Invalid Access (Linux #define EINJ_STATUS_INVAL) The original code report -EBUSY for both "Unknown Failure" and "Invalid Access" cases. Actually, firmware could do some platform dependent sanity checks and returns different error codes, e.g. "Invalid Access" to indicate to the user that the parameters they supplied cannot be used for injection. To this end, fix to return -EINVAL in the __einj_error_inject() error handling case instead of always -EBUSY, when explicitly indicated by the platform in the status of the completed operation. [1] ACPI Specification 6.5 18.6.1. Error Injection Table Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> --- changelog since v1: - elaborate commit log based on follow up discussion with Tony - pick up Reviewed-by tag of Tony --- drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c index b4373e575660..fa0b4320312e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c @@ -489,9 +489,15 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2, if (rc) return rc; val = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx); - if (val != EINJ_STATUS_SUCCESS) + if (val == EINJ_STATUS_FAIL) return -EBUSY; + else if (val == EINJ_STATUS_INVAL) + return -EINVAL; + /* + * The error is injected into the platform successfully, then it needs + * to trigger the error. + */ rc = apei_exec_run(&ctx, ACPI_EINJ_GET_TRIGGER_TABLE); if (rc) return rc; -- 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb
