On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 6:54 AM Kang Chen <void0red@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> devm_kzalloc may fail, clk_data->name might be null and will
> cause illegal address access later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kang Chen <void0red@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> index 3bbe2276c..80f945cbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static int fch_misc_setup(struct apd_private_data *pdata)
> if (!acpi_dev_get_property(adev, "clk-name", ACPI_TYPE_STRING, &obj)) {
> clk_data->name = devm_kzalloc(&adev->dev, obj->string.length,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!clk_data->name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> strcpy(clk_data->name, obj->string.pointer);
> } else {
> --
Applied as 6.4 material with some edits in the subject and changelog, thanks!
