On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:16:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Some of the functions do not provide Return: section on absence of which > > kernel-doc complains. Besides that several functions return the fwnode > > handle with incremented reference count. Add a respective note to make sure > > that the caller decrements it when it's not needed anymore. > > > > While at it, unify the style of the Return: sections. > > > > Reported-by: Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > > or please let me know if I need to pick it up. I can take it, thanks. greg k-h