On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 05:05:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:50:27PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > > Enable the ACPI processor driver for RISC-V. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > index ccbeab9500ec..b44ac8e55b54 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ config ACPI_CPPC_LIB > > > > config ACPI_PROCESSOR > > tristate "Processor" > > - depends on X86 || IA64 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH > > + depends on X86 || IA64 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV > > select ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE > > select ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS if X86 || IA64 || LOONGARCH > > select THERMAL > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > The commit message doesn't tell me if this is a premature config > enablement or if it's already necessary for this series. I think > if it's already necessary, then it should point out what requires > it in the commit message or be squashed into whatever patch > requires it (and also point out in that commit message why it's > required). > Thanks Drew. Let me drop this patch. We will need it in future when we need to enable LPI/CPPC etc. Thanks, Sunil
