On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800, > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a __crit : > > > Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the > > place. How ugly would that get? > > Like the attached patch. #ifdef CONFIG_DMI everywhere :-( > ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said "don't bother". Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people will keep breaking CONFIG_DMI=n all the time, because they will forget the ifdefs, and the number of people who test with CONFIG_DMI=n will be small. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
