Hi Andy,
Thank you for the review.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:40:55AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Parse newly added ACPI _CRS CSI-2 descriptor for CSI-2 and camera
> > configuration. For now, only figure out where the descriptor is present in
> > order to allow adding information from it to related devices.
>
> ...
>
> > + if (status != AE_OK) {
>
> ACPI_FAILURE()
Yes.
>
> > + acpi_handle_warn(inst_context->handle,
> > + "cannot get handle for %s\n",
> > + csi2->resource_source.string_ptr);
> > + return AE_OK;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + struct scan_check_crs_csi2_context inst_context = {
> > + .handle = handle,
> > + .res_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(inst_context.res_list),
> > + };
> > + struct list_head *list = context;
> > + struct crs_csi2 *csi2;
>
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inst_context.res_list);
>
> Do you still need this?
Oops. Forgot to remove it, I'll do in v4.
>
> ...
>
> > + acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> > + scan_check_crs_csi2_instance, &inst_context);
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&inst_context.res_list))
> > + return AE_OK;
>
> I'm wondering if you can utilize acpi_dev_get_resources().
We don't have an acpi_device yet. I'd rather keep scanning for _CRS CSI2
resources here, as we'd otherwise have to split creating acpi_device's and
registering them into two.
I'd say if someone had implemented this like that, I'd ask them to change
it.
>
> ...
>
> > + /* Collect the devices that have a _CRS CSI-2 resource */
> > + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
>
> Other serial buses limit the DEPTH by 32, why do we need more here?
I'm using the same value as for scanning devices to be added. Effectively
this is not a practical limit but it doesn't need to be.
>
> > + scan_check_crs_csi2, NULL, &crs_csi2_handles, NULL);
>
> ...
>
> > + sort(handle_refs, handle_count, sizeof(*handle_refs), crs_handle_cmp,
> > + NULL);
>
> A single line?
Can do...
>
> ...
>
> > + if (check_mul_overflow(sizeof(*ads->ports) +
> > + sizeof(*ads->nodes) * 2 +
> > + sizeof(*ads->nodeptrs) * 2,
> > + (size_t)this_count, &alloc_size) ||
>
> So, now you know why this_count can't be type of size_t?
Forgot to change this one, thanks!
>
> > + check_add_overflow(sizeof(*ads) + sizeof(*ads->nodes) +
> > + sizeof(*ads->nodeptrs) * 2,
> > + alloc_size, &alloc_size)) {
> > + acpi_handle_warn(handle, "too many handles (%u)",
> > + this_count);
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
