Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:49:52 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:40:29 +0000
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mark,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:45:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:  
> > > I'm not sure how we want to merge this, so I've moved the core ftrace
> > > patch to the start of the series so that it can more easily be placed on
> > > a stable branch if we want that to go via the ftrace tree and the rest
> > > to go via arm64.    
> > 
> > Happy to queue the whole series since Steve acked the ftrace changes.
> > But I'll put on a stable branch in case there are any conflicts with the
> > ftrace tree.
> >   
> 
> I actually do have a conflict with this patch (I'll post it soon).
> 
> I could just cherry pick it from your tree. Linus seems to be OK with that
> when it's just a single change.

Forget about it. I'll post the patch, but it's not important (we need it
mostly for something internal, but could possibly be useful to others). It
can wait a merge window or two to apply it.

So feel free to take this through your tree, and then I'll add my patch in
the merge window after that.

-- Steve




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux