For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c index 923fddb..673fb92 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c @@ -890,9 +890,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handl switch (event) { case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK: case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK: - printk("Processor driver received %s event\n", + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, + "Processor driver received %s event\n", (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ? - "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"); + "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK")); if (!is_processor_present(handle)) break; -- 1.4.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html