On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote: > > Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for > > evolving > > and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are > > differences in the way temperatures are reported out, we can go ahead > > and > > fix it. > > That's fine, but it *needs* to be done before 2.6.25 is released. > Otherwise we're stuck with the broken one forever, which is somewhat > longer than ideal. And, frankly, the thermal sysfs class should be marked EXPERIMENTAL in Kconfig at this time, IMHO. Otherwise, fixing it after 2.6.25 is out will be more difficult. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
