Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Thermal ACPI APIs for generic trip points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Daniel,

On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 16:01 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/01/2023 15:49, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Can I consider these changes ok for thermal/bleeding-edge ?
> > > 
> > > 
> > Hi, Daniel,
> > 
> > In general, the patch looks good to me.
> > But can you give me more time so that I can test them on my test
> > box by
> > this week?
> 
> Ah, yes, definitively. If you have a test box for these changes that
> is 
> awesome.

Yeah. I have one to test both drivers.

> 
> Do you have a suggestion for a x86 platform to test quark_dts, 
> processor_thermal_device_pci and intel_soc_dts_iosf ?

intel_soc_dts_iosf is for Baytrail platform. Both Baytrail and Quark
are nearly 10 years old, and I don't have any of them.

For processor_thermal_device_pci, it should be available on Alderlake
platforms. And I have an internal platform which I can help test the
patches.

thanks,
rui





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux