-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 4:02 PM
To: rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chen, Yu C <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, Yang5 <yang5.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: PNP: Introduce list of known non-PNP devices
CC Zhang Yang who has tested the patch.
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 07:25 +0000, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 18:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In some cases, PNP device IDs from acpi_pnp_device_ids[] are
> > returned by _CID for devices for which matching platform drivers are
> > present in the kernel and should be bound to them. However, the IDs
> > coming from _CID cause the PNP scan handler to attach to those
> > devices which prevents platform device objects from being created
> > for them.
> >
> > Address this by introducing a list of known non-PNP device IDs into
> > acpi_pnp.c such that if a device ID is there in that list, it cannot
> > be attached to by the PNP scan handler and add the platform runtime
> > update and telemetry device IDs to that list to start with.
> >
> > Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Zhang Yang <Yang5.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Yang
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> > @@ -348,10 +348,22 @@ static bool acpi_pnp_match(const char *i
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * If one of the device IDs below is present in the list of device
> > IDs of a
> > + * given ACPI device object, the PNP scan handler will not attach
> > to
> > that
> > + * object, because there is a proper non-PNP driver in the kernel
> > for the
> > + * device represented by it.
> > + */
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_nonpnp_device_ids[] = {
> > + {"INTC1080"},
> > + {"INTC1081"},
> > + {""},
> > +};
> > +
> > static int acpi_pnp_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > const struct acpi_device_id *id) {
> > - return 1;
> > + return !!acpi_match_device_ids(adev, acpi_nonpnp_device_ids);
>
> acpi_match_device_ids() returns True if the id matches, and in this
> case, acpi_pnp_attach() should return false, right?
>
It is __acpi_match_device() that returns True when matches, and
acpi_match_device_ids() returns 0 in this case.
So this is not a bug, sorry for the noise.
thanks,
rui
> thanks,
> rui
>
> > }
> >
> > static struct acpi_scan_handler acpi_pnp_handler = {
> >
> >
> >
