On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:06 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry, that is something I had intendeed to do but I hadn't extracted a > reproducer yet. I'll try to come up with something that can be included in the > commit message and reported to GCC folk (and double-check at the same time that > there's not another hidden cause) Yeah, no worries :) I suggested it because from my quick test it didn't appear to be reproducible trivially, so I thought having the reproducer would be nice. > I'm happy to move these, I just wasn't sure what the policy would be w.r.t. the > existing __weak and __cold defitions since those end up depending upon > __function_aligned. > > I assume I should move them all? i.e. move __weak as well? Yeah, with the current policy, all should be moved since their behavior now depends on the config (eventually). Cheers, Miguel
