Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 22:20:00 +0100
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20221228092045.80425-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
References: <20221228092045.80425-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:20 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> code.

This is great stuff.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

References:
- [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS
Next by Date: Re: [RFC-V3 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform notification for type4 and shared interrupt
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 1/3] gpiolib: Introduce gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put()
Next by thread: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Power Management] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux