On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:53:12AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:02:49AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:10:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...
> > >
> > > + Cc: Petr, Sergey
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> > > > which is a better coding practice.
> > >
> > > It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
> > > fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.
> > >
> > > Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
> > > tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
> > > like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).
> > >
> > > Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. Feel free to do that if it's not too late, with:
> >
> > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I intended to add this applies to the set.
>
> Thank you!
> I think it's a bit late for printk tree to consume this. If it's the case
> (Petr?) then I will submit a new version after v6.2-rc1 is out.
>
> > I don't think the linkelihood for having a new user for this API is high.
--
Sakari Ailus
