On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 05:46:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> First of all, _ELEMENT_SIZE() repeats existing sizeof_field() macro.
> Second, usage of _ARRAY_ELSIZE_LEN() adds unnecessary indirection
> to the data layout. It's more understandable when the data structure
> is placed explicitly. That said, get rid of those macros by replacing
> them with the existing helper and explicit data structure layout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For the series:
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3: fixed typo in PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY_LEN() impl (LKP)
> v2: rebased on latest Linux Next, fixed anon union assignment
> include/linux/property.h | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index 5d840299146d..0eab13a5c7df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/fwnode.h>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> struct device;
> @@ -311,24 +312,14 @@ struct property_entry {
> * crafted to avoid gcc-4.4.4's problems with initialization of anon unions
> * and structs.
> */
> -
> -#define __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT_SIZE(_elem_) \
> - sizeof(((struct property_entry *)NULL)->value._elem_[0])
> -
> -#define __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_ELSIZE_LEN(_name_, _elsize_, _Type_, \
> - _val_, _len_) \
> -(struct property_entry) { \
> - .name = _name_, \
> - .length = (_len_) * (_elsize_), \
> - .type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
> - { .pointer = _val_ }, \
> +#define __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _elem_, _Type_, _val_, _len_) \
> +(struct property_entry) { \
> + .name = _name_, \
> + .length = (_len_) * sizeof_field(struct property_entry, value._elem_[0]), \
> + .type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
> + { .pointer = _val_ }, \
> }
>
> -#define __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _elem_, _Type_, _val_, _len_)\
> - __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_ELSIZE_LEN(_name_, \
> - __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT_SIZE(_elem_), \
> - _Type_, _val_, _len_)
> -
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
> __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, u8_data, U8, _val_, _len_)
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_U16_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
> @@ -340,9 +331,12 @@ struct property_entry {
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
> __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, str, STRING, _val_, _len_)
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
> - __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_ELSIZE_LEN(_name_, \
> - sizeof(struct software_node_ref_args), \
> - REF, _val_, _len_)
> +(struct property_entry) { \
> + .name = _name_, \
> + .length = (_len_) * sizeof(struct software_node_ref_args), \
> + .type = DEV_PROP_REF, \
> + { .pointer = _val_ }, \
> +}
>
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY(_name_, _val_) \
> PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, ARRAY_SIZE(_val_))
> @@ -360,7 +354,7 @@ struct property_entry {
> #define __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT(_name_, _elem_, _Type_, _val_) \
> (struct property_entry) { \
> .name = _name_, \
> - .length = __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT_SIZE(_elem_), \
> + .length = sizeof_field(struct property_entry, value._elem_[0]), \
> .is_inline = true, \
> .type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
> { .value = { ._elem_[0] = _val_ } }, \
> --
> 2.35.1
--
heikki
