On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:56:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> which is a better coding practice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> index df6c94da2f6a..18974a72e94a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> struct pci_dev *cio2)
> {
> - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, *primary;
> struct cio2_sensor *sensor;
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> acpi_status status;
> @@ -322,7 +322,9 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> }
>
> sensor->adev = acpi_dev_get(adev);
> - adev->fwnode.secondary = fwnode;
> +
> + primary = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
> + primary->secondary = fwnode;
>
> cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(sensor);
>
This and also the others look good to me. FWIW, for the series:
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thanks,
--
heikki
